Agrarian Policy under Putin PDF Print E-mail

Stephen Wegren

Abstract

This article addresses the orientation of the agricultural policies carried out by the Russian government under Vladimir Putin, since he assumed power in January 2000. It examines the following aspects of agrarian policy: food import policy, agricultural debt policy, policy toward unprofitable farms, and agricultural credit policy. This particular focus begins from the premise that the period of radical reform is over, and agrarian policy is no longer intended to remake the agricultural system. Earlier agrarian policy concentrated on the reorganization of large farms, the privatization of farm land and property, and the attempt to supplant large farms with private family farms. Unlike the convulsive and turbulent agrarian change attempted by Boris Yeltsin, Putin's agrarian policy is pragmatic, consisting of measured steps that are intended to rebuild agricultural production and reduce reliance on food imports.

 

Contact Information

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research

Seattle Office
  • Box 353650
  • Box 224
  • Seattle, WA 98195
  • Tel: 206-616-1541
  • Fax: 866-937-9872
  • E-mail: info@nceeer.org
DC Office
  • 910 17th Street NW
  • Washington, DC 20006
  • Tel: 202-296-1677

usrf_logo2ac_logo_smallcarnegielogo_smallsd_logo_smallNEH

NCEEER

miffsuzzallopomak_children

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe.   More

Latest NCEEER Working Papers

2011_824-15_Yurchak

Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition

Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley

This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.