| The Strange Afterlife of Stalinist Musical Films |
|
|
|
|
Rimgaila Salys Abstract During the 1930s and 1940s Grigorii Aleksandrov and Ivan Pyr'ev directed a series of musical comedy films that became the most popular cinematic works of the Stalin years. These films lifted people's spirits and gave them a respite from the grim realities of everyday life during the difficult years of socialist construction and World War II. Aleksandrov's comedies were urban legends – Cinderella stories and show musicals – while Pyr'ev made folk musicals situated on collective farms. Because relatively few feature films were released during the Stalin years, the appearance of each new musical film became a major cultural event. The reputations of the Aleksandrov and Pyr'ev comedies suffered after the 20th Party Congress in 1956, but the films acquired a second life when they were reissued for public consumption during the Brezhnev years, even though dialogue from the films now figured in satirical popular parlance on alcoholism, sex and Socialist Realist iconography. In their post-Soviet afterlife the musical comedies acquired a complex signification. The Stalinist sign, with its negative charge, was both itself parodied and simultaneously employed to parody post-Soviet reality in films such as Tractor Drivers-2 (1992). In two recent films, Moskva and Maimyl (both 2001), contemporary quotations from Stalinist musicals juxtapose the idealism, optimism and semiotic wholeness of the Stalinist era to the demoralized, corrupt and fragmented post-Soviet present. |



National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe. More
Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition
Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley
This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.