| The Politics of Professionalism in Russia |
 |
 |
 |
|
Michael Urban, University of California, Santa Cruz The Politics of Professionalism in Russia April 2, 2008 Abstract The words "professional" and "professionalism" enjoy an almost magical ring in Russian political parlance. They are often intoned as a panacea setting right any number of enumerated ills. They connote a mastery of affairs and thus are sought-for things commonly regarded to be woefully absent in the world of practical endeavors. They also admit to quite different definitions, sometimes opposing the idea of politics, sometimes coinciding with it. This polysemic quality of "professional" appears to be of critical import for drawing divisions and constructing group identities in the world of politics. This study seeks to determine how the word "professional" has been used by past and present members of Russia's political class and outlines two opposing discourses that constitute its meanings. It also has a secondary objective: viz., to frame the results reported, here, within the scope of a dynamic model of change in Soviet, and now Russian, political communication. Because these objectives are analytically distinct, I return to the second one only in conclusion. |
Login Form
NCEEER Menu
Contact Information
National Council for Eurasian and East European Research
Seattle Office
- Box 353650
- Box 224
- Seattle, WA 98195
- Tel: 206-616-1541
- Fax: 866-937-9872
- E-mail: info@nceeer.org
DC Office
- 910 17th Street NW
- Washington, DC 20006
- Tel: 202-296-1677
NCEEER
National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe. More
Latest NCEEER Working Papers
Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition
Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley
This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.
