Promoting Political Change and Economic Revitalization in the Western Balkans: The Role of the European Union PDF Print E-mail

Milada Anna Vachudova, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

September 2006

Promoting Political Change and Economic Revitalization in the Western Balkans: The Role of the European Union

Abstract

Moving toward joining the European Union (EU) is almost universally recognized by Western governments, international organizations and non-governmental organizations as the only viable strategy for bringing stability, democracy and economic revitalization to the Western Balkans. This article has three parts. First, it explores the politics of enlargement in the EU today, following the failure of the EU constitution and the widespread feeling of 'enlargement fatigue.' Second, it explains why the dynamics of qualifying for EU membership make EU leverage so powerful in comparison to the influence of other international actors. Third, it argues that the EU needs to adjust its leverage in four distinct ways in order to make it work in the much more difficult domestic conditions of most Western Balkan states.

 

Contact Information

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research

Seattle Office
  • Box 353650
  • Box 224
  • Seattle, WA 98195
  • Tel: 206-616-1541
  • Fax: 866-937-9872
  • E-mail: info@nceeer.org
DC Office
  • 910 17th Street NW
  • Washington, DC 20006
  • Tel: 202-296-1677

usrf_logo2ac_logo_smallcarnegielogo_smallsd_logo_smallNEH

NCEEER

miffsuzzallopomak_children

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe.   More

Latest NCEEER Working Papers

2011_824-15_Yurchak

Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition

Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley

This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.