The Transformation of State-Society Relations in Post-Soviet Central Asia PDF Print E-mail

Kelly McMann

The Transformation of State-Society Relations in Post-Soviet Central Asia

February 16, 2005

Abstract

Based on a preliminary analysis of mass survey data from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan, this paper argues that citizens of these countries have become disengaged from their states. States are no longer involved in citizens' lives and people interact little with their officials. Also most citizens now compete for state resources instead of regularly receiving them. In the Soviet era a main characteristic of the state was that it was a source of benefits, such as medical services and education. In the post-Soviet era a key attribute of the state is that it is an arena where citizens vie to obtain resources, like jobs. Because post-Soviet states continue to control a preponderance of resources relative to non-state entities, societal actors, including Islamic leaders and elders, have not taken over the state's role. Citizens turn to government officials, before societal actors, for assistance with everyday problems.

 

Contact Information

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research

Seattle Office
  • Box 353650
  • Box 224
  • Seattle, WA 98195
  • Tel: 206-616-1541
  • Fax: 866-937-9872
  • E-mail: info@nceeer.org
DC Office
  • 910 17th Street NW
  • Washington, DC 20006
  • Tel: 202-296-1677

usrf_logo2ac_logo_smallcarnegielogo_smallsd_logo_smallNEH

NCEEER

miffsuzzallopomak_children

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe.   More

Latest NCEEER Working Papers

2011_824-15_Yurchak

Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition

Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley

This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.