| Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State |
|
|
|
|
Anna Grzymala-Busse Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State July 13, 2004 Abstract In their study of the structures that shape political behavior, scholars have emphasized the impact of formal, or "parchment" institutions. These range from constitutions to legislative bodies to regulatory frameworks, each one serving as a set of rules for political actors. In parallel, scholars have examined the importance of their "graffiti" counterparts: informal institutions such as local customs, reputations, and "folkways" that are found outside of the formal halls of power. Rather than focusing on either set of institutions alone, this project examines the interactions between formal politics and informal institutions—unofficial solutions and unwritten rules—and how these played out in the post-communist states in East Central Europe. Second, while much of the literature has assumed that informal institutions will either become formalized, or persist to undermine formal institutions, I find that under certain competitive conditions informal institutions can reinforce formal rules, encouraging their development and strengthening their power to structure politics. |



National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe. More
Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition
Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley
This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.