| A Muscovite Economic Model |
|
|
|
|
Jarmo T. Kotilaine A Muscovite Economic Model February 19, 2004 Abstract This paper examines a series of institutional changes and reforms of the Russian economy in the course of the 17th century. These changes, it will be argued, were among the most fundamental transformations experienced by Russia during its history and affected virtually the entire population. They can be deemed to have created a new economic paradigm, something dubbed here a "Muscovite economic model," which had long-standing consequences for the development of the economy, many of them felt even today. It will be argued that the longevity of the new institutional setup was amplified by its cultural assimilation. The behavioral responses called forth by the reforms over time congealed into a key element of what, for want of a better expression, might be termed the "Russian way of life." This cultural response was remarkably resistant to subsequent attempts to modify the system. Late Muscovy was in many ways unique among European countries. It was a very large, sparsely populated country situated on the eastern periphery of Europe and, through the acquisition of Siberia, the northern edge of Asia. It was culturally distinct from much of the rest of the continent and seen as such by contemporary observers who often focused on the perceived brutality and "primitiveness" of Muscovite ways. In economic terms, 17th-century Muscovy closely conformed to a key tenet of W. Kula's definition of feudalism. It was "a socio-economic system which is predominantly agrarian and characterized by a low level of productive forces and of commercialization." It will be argued that, by the time Russian empire emerged in the early 18th century, Russia increasingly met even the second half of Kula's definition as "a corporate system in which the basic unit of production is a large landed estate surrounded by the small plots of peasants who are dependent on the former both economically and juridically, and who have to furnish various services to the lord and submit to his authority." |



National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe. More
Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition
Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley
This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.