Continuity and Change in Family Policies of the New European Democracies: A Comparison of Poland, Hungary, and Romania, Part One: Institutional Legacies and Path Dependence in Family Policies – 1945 to 2000 PDF Print E-mail

 

Tomasz Inglot, Minnesota State University

Abstract

This project aims to explain considerable variation in family policies across the three former communist states, Poland, Hungary, and Romania. We analyze historical legacies of the old regime and the early transition (1945-2000). We identify elements of continuity and change and trace patterns of convergence and divergence of family policies across countries and across time in each country. We aim to determine the impact of international vs. domestic factors on these welfare states and address the relationship between path dependence and path departure in post-communist and European social policies. In doing so, we draw on the rich tradition of historical-institutionalism and examine the possibility of “transformative” incremental change. We argue, however, that comparative study of family policies will yield the best results when we pay equal attention to political agency and discourse.

 

Contact Information

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research

Seattle Office
  • Box 353650
  • Box 224
  • Seattle, WA 98195
  • Tel: 206-616-1541
  • Fax: 866-937-9872
  • E-mail: info@nceeer.org
DC Office
  • 910 17th Street NW
  • Washington, DC 20006
  • Tel: 202-296-1677

usrf_logo2ac_logo_smallcarnegielogo_smallsd_logo_smallNEH

NCEEER

miffsuzzallopomak_children

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe.   More

Latest NCEEER Working Papers

2011_824-15_Yurchak

Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition

Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley

This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.