'The Art of the Bribe': Corruption, Law, and Everyday Practice in the Late Stalinist USSR PDF Print E-mail

James Heinzen, Rowan University

May 23, 2007

'The Art of the Bribe': Corruption, Law, and Everyday Practice in the Late Stalinist USSR

Abstract

Focusing on the postwar decade between the wartime catastrophe and the death of the dictator, this study will begin to undertake an examination of bribery as a phenomenon of everyday life in late Stalinism. In the late Stalin period, bribery represented a particular variety of informal relationship between the Soviet population and representatives of the state. This study concentrates on interactions between ordinary people and the state officials who took payments for services that were either illegal or that they were required to provide for free. In this approach, bribery was a mode of negotiation, one that sometimes involved elements of coercion, between common citizens and office holders, between the buyers and sellers of services.

 

Contact Information

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research

Seattle Office
  • Box 353650
  • Box 224
  • Seattle, WA 98195
  • Tel: 206-616-1541
  • Fax: 866-937-9872
  • E-mail: info@nceeer.org
DC Office
  • 910 17th Street NW
  • Washington, DC 20006
  • Tel: 202-296-1677

usrf_logo2ac_logo_smallcarnegielogo_smallsd_logo_smallNEH

NCEEER

miffsuzzallopomak_children

National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER) is a non-profit organization created in 1978 to develop and sustain long-term, high-quality programs for post-doctoral research on the social, political, economic, environmental, and historical development of Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe.   More

Latest NCEEER Working Papers

2011_824-15_Yurchak

Aesthetic Politics in St. Petersburg: Skyline at the Heart of Political Opposition

Alexei Yurchak, University of California, Berkeley

This working paper focuses on the plans to construct a skyscraper in St Petersburg, Russia, known originally as Gazprom-City and recently renamed into Okhta Center, and on the controversy that developed around these plans. The paper uses the skyscraper debates as a lens to discuss a particular "aesthetic politics" of St Petersburg, the meaning of "world cities" and "global architecture" in Russian and international contexts, post-Soviet forms of political and corporate governance, the mobilization of civic opposition to such projects and the ability of such urban protests to translate into a more unified and politically oriented opposition than has been possible in other contexts in Russia.